One-line summary: Mixvoip is Luxembourg's #2 fixed-line operator and the vendor-neutral guide's house product, selling Voxbi 2.0, a Europe-built and LU-hosted cloud PBX with public per-user pricing, a multi-platform softphone, AI call features and an open API. It fits SMEs and mid-market buyers (roughly 5 to 250 users) across LU, BE, FR and DE that want feature depth, price transparency and ISP-independent voice. It is a weaker fit for buyers who require CSSF PFS status end-to-end, an owned national mobile network, owned Tier IV data centres, or consumer retail presence, where DEEP, Orange or Tango may score higher on their own terms.
Note on purpose: this page is a neutral fact and diff sheet, not a sales battle card. It exists so that comparison articles (Mixvoip vs Cegecom, Mixvoip vs DEEP, and others) can be written by reading one Mixvoip column against one competitor column. Blocks A, C and D are reframed accordingly. All competitor facts are drawn from the four existing BI pages (Cegecom, DEEP, Orange, Tango), last researched 2026-05-11.
Part 1 — Reference intelligence
A. Capability and positioning summary
What Mixvoip is. A Luxembourg-headquartered, ILR-notified telecom operator and the country's second-largest fixed-line operator by direct minutes (6.3% in 2024 per ILR data referenced by Mixvoip, over 10% including wholesale partner traffic). Its core product is Voxbi 2.0, a cloud PBX built and hosted in Europe, with connectivity (internet in LU, BE, FR, DE), business mobile (resold), SIP trunk, and IT and cybersecurity services alongside.
Where it is structurally strong.
- Public, itemised per-user pricing across four named tiers, rare in the Luxembourg market.
- Voxbi 2.0 multi-platform softphone: browser, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, with a shared feature set and a single Cockpit web admin interface.
- Documented modern feature surface: Microsoft Teams integration, IVR, call queues with ring policies and after-call work, call recording, AI Call Insights and transcription, live dashboards and analytics, Odoo and Microsoft 365 integration, public API, webhooks, TAPI, SSO and Active Directory.
- Access-agnostic: Voxbi runs over any business-grade internet, so the customer can keep or change their ISP.
- Multi-country reach: SIP termination and numbering across LU, BE, FR and DE under one tenant.
- ISO/IEC 27001 ISMS covering its telephony services, with recording options aligned to MiFID II and PSF expectations.
- Patented 2G-network mobile integration for call stability independent of VoIP and data.
Where it is structurally weaker (stated plainly).
- Not a CSSF "Professionnel du Secteur Financier" (PFS) entity in its own right; PFS-grade managed services need a partner stack. DEEP holds PFS directly.
- Resells mobile rather than owning a mobile network. Orange and Tango own their MNO and 5G spectrum; DEEP owns the POST mobile network.
- Does not own Tier IV data centres of its own; uses Tier III and IV partner facilities. DEEP owns three Tier IV sites in Luxembourg; Cegecom owns Tier III and IV sites.
- No consumer retail footprint or mass-market brand recognition. Orange and Tango have shops and decades of consumer presence.
- Has not won the Ookla "Best Fixed Network" award that Orange holds for H1 2025 and H1 2026.
- Smaller in headcount and group scope than the incumbents (POST/DEEP around 4,500 group staff; Proximus Luxembourg 700 to 800; Mixvoip is a focused B2B operator).
Primary buyer fit. SMEs and mid-market organisations of roughly 5 to 250 users in Luxembourg and the Greater Region that treat the phone system as a feature-rich productivity tool, value transparent pricing, and want voice decoupled from a single access or mobile vendor.
B. Reference question bank (capability framing)
These mirror the competitor discovery blocks so an article can pair a buyer concern with the Mixvoip fact. Phrased neutrally.
Cost and pricing model.
- Voxbi publishes four per-user tiers (Essential, Professional, Business, Enterprise) with both metered and flat-rate options; what does the competitor publish, and at which scope does it become quote-only?
- What is included in the per-user price versus charged as an add-on (recording retention, additional history, SIP carrier, analytics)?
- What is the contract horizon, and how does it compare to the competitor's 24 or 36-month commitments?
Features.
- Does the buyer need Microsoft Teams calling, IVR, queues, recording, analytics, CRM integration or an API? Voxbi documents each as a product capability.
- Which endpoints do users actually use: desk phone, browser, desktop softphone, mobile? Voxbi covers all four.
- Does the buyer need AI call summaries, transcription or sentiment tagging? Voxbi ships Call Insights.
Operational.
- Is admin self-service (Voxbi Cockpit) or operator-ticket-driven at the competitor?
- What SLA is in writing, and is it tied to internet or to the PBX software layer?
- How fast can a user be added or removed, and by whom?
Strategic.
- If the buyer changes ISP, does the phone system move with them? Voxbi is access-agnostic.
- Are there employees in BE, FR or DE who need local numbers under one PBX?
- Is there a compliance driver (PSF, MiFID II) that sets recording, retention and certification requirements?
C. Cross-competitor diff matrix
The core reusable block. Each row is a normalised axis; read the Mixvoip cell against the competitor cell to draft a comparison. Competitor cells summarise the four BI pages (2026-05-11).
Axis | Mixvoip (Voxbi 2.0) | Cegecom | DEEP (POST) | Orange LU | Tango |
Public pricing | Full per-user rate card, 4 tiers, metered and flat | None, quote-only | Only Essentials bundle and mobile; core PBX quote-only | None for Virtual PBX; only Box Pro 500 bundle | One headline seat (9.90 EUR); add-ons not consolidated |
Pricing transparency (their BI score) | High (house benchmark) | 1 / 5 | 2 / 5 | 2 / 5 | 2 / 5 |
Desktop softphone (Win/macOS) | Yes, native, shared feature set | Not publicly named | Via Webex or Teams client | Not documented | Not documented |
Browser softphone | Yes (Voxbi Web) | Unclear | Via Webex/Teams web | Not documented | Not documented |
Microsoft Teams calling | Yes, documented integration | Operator Connect and Direct Routing | MS Teams CloudVoice (Direct Routing) | No public evidence | No public evidence |
IVR, queues, ACD | Yes, with ring policies and ACW | Yes (advanced in Package L, paid workshop) | Yes (via Webex/Teams platforms) | Not documented | Basic "voice reception" only |
Call recording | Yes, tiered retention, MiFID/PSF-aligned | Yes, no public retention detail | Partial, by tier | No public evidence | No public evidence |
Analytics and AI | Live dashboards, AI Call Insights, transcription | Not promoted | Webex/Teams platform reports | No public evidence | No public evidence |
CRM integration | Odoo, MS365; documented | None named | Via Webex/Teams app stores | No public evidence | No public evidence |
Public API | Yes, plus webhooks, TAPI | Unclear | Webex/Graph APIs, not DEEP's own | No public evidence | No public evidence |
Self-service admin | Voxbi Cockpit, full web UI | UC myPortal | MyConnectedOffice | "Back office", limited detail | Basic web portal |
Access independence | Runs over any internet | Tends to bundle (COMPLETE, dedicated lines) | Bundle-heavy (ConnectedOffice) | Box Pro couples PBX to Orange fibre | Best on Tango fibre |
Multi-country numbering | LU, BE, FR, DE under one tenant | Free GR internal calls; intl not self-serve | LU default, intl via partners | Multi-site, not multi-country | LU-only home stations |
Owned mobile network | No, resells mobile | No | Yes (POST) | Yes (own MNO, 5G) | Yes (own MNO, 5G) |
Owned data centres | Tier III/IV partner facilities | Owned Tier III and IV | Owned, three Tier IV | "Orange Cloud", residency unspecified | Two redundant LU DCs |
PFS status | No, partner stack for PFS-grade | No | Yes (PFS) | No public evidence | No (Proximus NXT scope) |
ISO 27001 (telephony) | Yes, ISMS covers services | Yes (plus 9001/14001/45001) | Yes (plus broad ISO set, PCI DSS L1) | No public evidence for Virtual PBX | Group-level only, not Fix4Bizz-specific |
Typical contract horizon | Shorter commitments | 24 to 36 months (estimate) | 24 to 36 months | 24 months | Commitment on bundles |
Target segment | SME and mid-market, ~5 to 250 users | Mid-market and enterprise | Regulated, multi-site, enterprise | SME convergence buyers | Under 10 employees |
D. Buyer fit map (neutral)
Where Mixvoip is the stronger objective fit, and where each rival is, stated without sales framing.
Mixvoip is the stronger fit when the buyer:
- Wants public per-user pricing they can model without a sales call.
- Needs a modern multi-platform softphone as the primary endpoint, not just a desk phone or mobile twinning.
- Needs documented Teams calling, IVR, queues, recording, analytics, CRM integration or an API.
- Operates across LU, BE, FR or DE and wants local numbers under one PBX.
- Wants voice independent of the access provider, so the phone system survives an ISP change.
- Is an SME or mid-market firm of roughly 10 to 250 users that wants enterprise features without enterprise procurement complexity.
A competitor may be the stronger fit when the buyer:
- Requires CSSF PFS status end-to-end on the voice path: DEEP (holds PFS directly).
- Wants a single state-owned full-stack incumbent with owned Tier IV data centres and the widest ISO and PCI scope: DEEP.
- Is already deep inside the artelis fibre, datacentre or wholesale footprint and wants one managed contract: Cegecom.
- Prioritises owned national fibre with award-winning consumer-grade quality and a single converged bill across mobile, fibre, TV and PBX: Orange.
- Is a 1 to 10-person Luxembourg-only office that wants the cheapest landline-replacement seat bundled with fibre and mobile on one invoice: Tango.
The deciding factor (general). Whether the buyer treats cloud telephony as a feature-rich, separately optimised product (favours Mixvoip) or as one tile inside a bundled, single-vendor relationship (favours the incumbents).
E. Pricing (public)
Unlike the four operators studied, Mixvoip publishes a complete per-user rate card for Voxbi cloud PBX. Four named tiers, each available as a metered per-user price or a flat unlimited-calls price, plus shared-phone pricing. All figures are per month, excluding VAT, verified on the Voxbi pricing page on 2026-05-23.
Tier | Metered per user | Flat per user | For whom |
Essential | 5.20 EUR | 11.60 EUR | Small businesses, startups, entrepreneurs |
Professional | 7.70 EUR | 14.10 EUR | Growing medium businesses |
Business | 11.20 EUR | 17.60 EUR | Larger enterprises with specific needs |
Enterprise | 17.10 EUR | 23.50 EUR | Companies with sites needing interconnection |
Shared-phone pricing (a phone with no fixed user) runs 3.30 to 5.70 EUR metered and 6.50 to 8.90 EUR flat across the tiers. Included in every tier: LU-cloud hosting, security and firmware updates, anti-fraud protection, Voxbi Windows/Web/mobile clients, Click2Call, automatic PBX upgrades and browser video meetings. Tier differences cover call-history and recording retention, SIP carrier, Tempus, monitoring, analytics, AI Insights, API and SSO.
Posture versus the set. Voxbi is the only product among the five with a complete, public, per-user price book. Tango publishes a single headline seat price (9.90 EUR) but not the add-on stack. Cegecom, DEEP and Orange are quote-only for their core cloud PBX, with DEEP and Orange publishing only their lightest bundle (ConnectedOffice Essentials, Box Pro 500). The transparency reference scores from the BI set are Cegecom 1/5, DEEP 2/5, Orange 2/5, Tango 2/5; Mixvoip is the high-transparency anchor these are measured against.
F. Trigger and signal list (inbound interest)
Reframed as signals that a buyer is comparing Mixvoip against a named competitor, useful for content timing.
Trigger | What it signals | Content motion |
Buyer mentions a Cegecom or DEEP renewal at 24 or 36 months | Lock-in window opening | Surface the relevant vs-page and a TCO explainer |
Buyer is rolling out Microsoft 365 or Teams | Teams calling demand | Teams calling comparison content |
Buyer cites a quote-only competitor and wants a number | Price-transparency gap | Public pricing page plus "what to ask before signing" |
Buyer has staff in BE, FR or DE | Multi-country numbering need | Cross-border use-case page |
Buyer is a PSF or fund-services firm | Compliance recording need | Recording and PSF/MiFID content; note partner-PFS path honestly |
Buyer outgrows Tango's 10-employee scope | Segment mismatch | SME 10 to 200 user comparison content |
G. Refresh log
Date | Change | Source | Logged by |
2026-05-23 | Initial Mixvoip reference and comparison sheet created, aligned to the Cegecom, DEEP, Orange and Tango BI pages. | mixvoip.com (Voxbi 2.0, pricing, features), the four existing BI pages, ILR market-share references | Claude (drafted with Miro) |
Part 2 — AI / RAG-friendly blocks
H. Q&A for retrieval
Company and position
Q: What is Mixvoip?
A: A Luxembourg-headquartered, ILR-notified telecom operator providing cloud PBX (Voxbi), internet, SIP trunk, business mobile, and IT and cybersecurity services in Luxembourg, Belgium, France and Germany.
Q: How large is Mixvoip in the Luxembourg market?
A: It is the second-largest fixed-line operator by direct minutes per ILR data referenced by Mixvoip (6.3% direct share in 2024, over 10% including wholesale partner traffic).
Q: What is Voxbi?
A: Voxbi 2.0 is Mixvoip's cloud PBX, developed and hosted in Europe, usable on Windows, macOS, iOS, Android and in the browser, managed through the Cockpit web interface, built with input from more than 4,500 customers.
Q: Where is Voxbi hosted?
A: In Mixvoip's Luxembourg cloud, on Tier III and IV partner data-centre facilities.
Q: Is Mixvoip a PFS?
A: No. Mixvoip is not a CSSF "Professionnel du Secteur Financier" in its own right; PFS-grade managed services are arranged via partners. Its ISMS is ISO/IEC 27001 certified.
Product features
Q: Does Voxbi support Microsoft Teams?
A: Yes, through a documented Teams integration, alongside Odoo, Microsoft 365, TAPI and a public API.
Q: Does Voxbi offer a desktop softphone?
A: Yes, native clients for Windows and macOS, plus a browser client and mobile apps, all sharing the same feature set.
Q: Does Voxbi record calls?
A: Yes, with retention that scales by tier, and options aligned to MiFID II and PSF expectations.
Q: Does Voxbi have AI features?
A: Yes, Call Insights uses AI to summarise calls and add tags; transcription and analytics are available, with AI Insights on the Enterprise tier.
Q: Does Voxbi need Mixvoip internet?
A: No. Voxbi runs over any business-grade internet, so customers can keep or change their ISP.
Pricing and contracts
Q: Does Mixvoip publish prices?
A: Yes. Voxbi has a public per-user rate card with four tiers, in metered and flat-rate forms, plus shared-phone pricing, all excluding VAT.
Q: What are the Voxbi tiers?
A: Essential, Professional, Business and Enterprise, differentiated by call and recording history, SIP carrier, Tempus, analytics, AI Insights, API and SSO, with mapped SLA levels.
Q: Is Mixvoip cheaper than the competitors?
A: It depends on scope. Headline seat prices vary; the durable difference is that Mixvoip publishes a full per-user price book while most competitors are quote-only above their lightest bundle.
Switching, porting, lock-in
Q: Can a business keep its numbers when moving to or from Mixvoip?
A: Yes, under ILR number portability rules; one working day legal, around five working days end-to-end in practice.
Q: Does Mixvoip support existing phones?
A: Yes, it certifies and reconfigures mainstream SIP hardware (Yealink, Fanvil, Grandstream, Snom, Gigaset DECT and others) rather than forcing a rebuy.
Q: Can a customer bring their own carrier?
A: Yes, Voxbi supports Bring Your Own Carrier (BYOC).
I. Controlled vocabulary
Maps Mixvoip terms to the competitor terms already catalogued in the four BI pages, so an article can translate in either direction.
Mixvoip / pbx.lu term | Competitor equivalents (from BI pages) |
Voxbi cloud PBX | Managed Com (Cegecom), CloudPBX (DEEP), Virtual PBX (Orange), Fix4Bizz (Tango) |
Voxbi user (extension) | Extension (Orange), workstation (Tango) |
Voxbi mobile | Orange Cloud Phone, Tango Bizz2Go, Cegecom TeamFON app |
Voxbi Cockpit (web admin) | UC myPortal (Cegecom), MyConnectedOffice (DEEP), back office (Orange), MyTango |
Teams integration | Operator Connect / Direct Routing (Cegecom), MS Teams CloudVoice (DEEP) |
FMC / mobile integration | LuxZone (DEEP), Bizz2Go (Tango), FMC (Cegecom) |
Internet + voice (unbundled) | COMPLETE (Cegecom), ConnectedOffice (DEEP), Box Pro 500 (Orange), Business Pack (Tango) |
SIP trunk | PHONE SIP-TRUNK (Cegecom), SIP Trunk (DEEP) |
Inclusive calling | Pack Communication Fixe Bizz (Tango) |
Tempus (time attendance) | No direct competitor equivalent |
Call Insights (AI) | No documented competitor equivalent |
Part 3 — Deep reference
1. Executive summary
Mixvoip is a Luxembourg-headquartered, ILR-notified telecom operator and the country's second-largest fixed-line operator by direct minutes (6.3% in 2024 per ILR data referenced by Mixvoip, over 10% with wholesale). Its core product is Voxbi 2.0, a cloud PBX developed and hosted in Europe, rebuilt over three years with input from more than 4,500 customers and released as a redesigned platform with a new Cockpit web admin interface. Voxbi works on Windows, macOS, iOS, Android and in the browser, with a shared feature set across endpoints.
The product surface is broad and publicly documented: smart and time-based call routing, IVR, call queues with ring policies and after-call work, multicast paging, FMC and mobile twinning, a patented 2G mobile integration for call stability, live dashboards, advanced analytics, AI Call Insights and transcription, call recording, SSO and Active Directory, an open API with webhooks and TAPI, and integrations including Odoo, Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Teams. Pricing is public across four tiers (Essential, Professional, Business, Enterprise) in metered and flat-rate forms.
Commercially, Mixvoip sits between the bundle-led incumbents and the niche micro-business products. It is access-agnostic (voice over any internet), multi-country (LU, BE, FR, DE under one tenant), and transparent on price, which differentiates it from the four operators studied. Its honest limitations are structural rather than product-level: it is not a PFS entity, it resells rather than owns mobile, it does not own Tier IV data centres, and it has no consumer retail or mass-market brand.
Against the studied set, the recurring pattern is consistent: Mixvoip wins on feature depth, price transparency, multi-platform softphone, multi-country reach and ISP independence; the incumbents win on owned infrastructure, regulatory status (PFS), single-vendor breadth and brand or network ownership.
2. Company and market position
Mixvoip is a Luxembourg-based business telecom operator, ILR-notified, operating cloud PBX, SIP trunk, internet, business mobile and IT and security services across Luxembourg, Belgium, France and Germany. It positions itself as a focused B2B operator rather than a consumer brand, and reports the second-largest fixed-line position in Luxembourg by direct minutes per ILR data (6.3% in 2024, over 10% including wholesale partner traffic). Its customer base passed 4,500 businesses during the Voxbi 2.0 development cycle.
Market role: Mixvoip is a voice-first operator. Where Cegecom and DEEP lead with connectivity, data centres and a broad ICT catalogue, and Orange and Tango lead with consumer mobile and fibre, Mixvoip's centre of gravity is the cloud PBX itself, supported by connectivity and IT rather than the reverse. This is the structural distinction that most comparison articles should anchor on.
Group scope and presence: Mixvoip operates in four countries directly, which is its main geographic advantage over the LU-centric or LU-and-DE competitors. It does not run a consumer retail network and is smaller in headcount than POST/DEEP (around 4,500 group staff) or Proximus Luxembourg (700 to 800).
3. Product portfolio
Category | Offering | Notes |
Cloud PBX | Voxbi 2.0 | Four tiers; browser, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android; Cockpit admin; EU-built, LU-hosted |
Mobile app | Voxbi mobile (iOS, Android) | Default-phone-app capable on iOS 26+; CarPlay and Android Auto |
SIP trunk | Mixvoip SIP trunk | LU, BE, FR, DE and more; certified with multiple PBX brands (3CX, Innovaphone, Wildix, Emios) |
Microsoft Teams | Teams integration via Mixvoip SIP | Direct Routing path |
Business mobile | Resold mobile, FMC, EU SIM with fixed number | Not an owned MNO |
Internet | Business internet in LU, BE, FR, DE; 4G/5G and satellite backup | Voice not dependent on Mixvoip access |
Tempus | Time attendance and tracking module | Distinctive add-on, no direct competitor equivalent |
IT and security | Co-managed LAN, cybersecurity, DDoS, firewalls, MDM | Complementary to a customer's existing SOC |
4. Feature reference
A capability list phrased to drop straight into the competitor feature tables (Yes / documented unless noted).
Capability | Voxbi | Note |
Hosted cloud PBX | Yes | EU-built, LU-hosted |
SIP trunk | Yes | Multi-country, multi-PBX certified |
Mobile app | Yes | iOS, Android, CarPlay/Android Auto |
Desktop softphone | Yes | Windows and macOS, native |
Browser softphone | Yes | Voxbi Web, no install |
Desk phone support | Yes | Yealink, Fanvil, Grandstream, Snom, Gigaset DECT |
Microsoft Teams | Yes | Direct Routing |
IVR, queues, ACD | Yes | Ring policies, ACW, call priority |
Call recording | Yes | Tiered retention, MiFID/PSF-aligned, external storage option |
Analytics and AI | Yes | Live dashboards, Call Insights, transcription, statistics |
Voicemail | Yes | Standard |
Business continuity | Yes | Patented 2G mobile integration; BYOC for carrier redundancy |
CRM integration | Yes | Odoo, Microsoft 365; API for others |
Public API | Yes | Plus webhooks and TAPI |
Admin portal | Yes | Voxbi Cockpit, full self-service |
Multi-site | Yes | Shared dial plan |
International numbers | Yes | LU, BE, FR, DE under one tenant |
Remote work | Yes | All endpoints, any country |
Access independence | Yes | Any business internet |
Number portability | Yes | ILR, in-house porting |
SSO / AD / LDAP | Yes | Business and Enterprise tiers |
SLA tiers | Yes | Mapped to plan and to internet status |
ISO 27001 | Yes | ISMS covers services |
PFS status | No | Partner stack for PFS-grade |
Owned mobile network | No | Resells mobile |
Owned Tier IV data centre | No | Tier III/IV partner facilities |
5. Service model
Onboarding and migration. Self-serve or co-managed: customers can configure Voxbi through Cockpit, or have the Mixvoip team co-manage. Number porting handled in-house under ILR rules. Existing SIP phones reconfigured rather than replaced.
Support. Dedicated business support model in Luxembourg, multilingual. Mixvoip publishes SLA terms mapped to plan tier and to whether the customer uses Mixvoip internet.
Languages. Multilingual local support, consistent with the Luxembourg market.
Managed vs self-service. Both. The Cockpit web interface exposes user, call-flow and queue configuration to the customer; co-management is available where wanted. This contrasts with the operator-ticket-driven model at Orange and Tango and the project-led model at Cegecom and DEEP.
Hardware. Certified SIP hardware across Yealink, Fanvil, Grandstream, Snom, Gigaset DECT, plus hotel and specialised phones; automatic firmware upgrades included.
Portability. ILR-standard, handled in-house, no accelerated-timeline claims beyond the regulated process.
Enterprise readiness. Strong on feature depth, multi-site, SSO/AD, recording compliance and analytics. Weaker than DEEP on regulatory status: no in-house PFS, no owned Tier IV data centre, so the largest CSSF-regulated mandates may need a partner stack.
SME friendliness. Strong: public pricing, self-service admin, shorter commitments, no minimum-enterprise scope. This is the inverse of Cegecom and DEEP, whose SME journeys lean on quotes and longer contracts.
6. Pricing assessment
6.1 Public pricing summary
Voxbi publishes a full per-user rate card: four tiers (Essential, Professional, Business, Enterprise), each in a metered per-user form and a flat unlimited-calls form, plus shared-phone pricing, all excluding VAT. A public feature matrix maps each tier to call-history and recording retention, SIP carrier, Tempus, analytics, AI Insights, API and SSO, and to SLA level. The verified figures are set out in block E above.
6.2 Transparency posture
High, by design. Mixvoip is the published-price anchor against which the BI set is scored (Cegecom 1/5, DEEP 2/5, Orange 2/5, Tango 2/5). The structural point for articles: a buyer can model a full Voxbi quote from the website; for the four competitors, the core PBX requires contacting sales.
6.3 Cost considerations to be honest about
- Metered tiers bill per-user by usage; flat tiers cost more per seat but cap usage. The right tier depends on call volume, so "cheapest seat" is not automatically Voxbi or automatically a competitor.
- Recording retention, additional call history and external recording storage are add-ons above the base seat on most tiers.
- SIP carrier is included from Professional upward, not on Essential.
- Hardware, number ranges and internet (if taken from Mixvoip) are separate lines, as with any operator.
6.4 Buyer questions Mixvoip answers well
- What is the exact per-user price for my tier and usage? (Public.)
- Which features are in my tier versus add-ons? (Public matrix.)
- Can I keep my ISP? (Yes.)
- Can I get local numbers in BE, FR, DE? (Yes.)
- Is there a desktop softphone and a browser client? (Yes, both.)
- Is recording aligned to MiFID/PSF? (Yes, with caveats on PFS-grade managed services.)
7. Ideal customer profile
Best fit
- SMEs and mid-market firms of roughly 10 to 250 users in LU and the Greater Region.
- Buyers who want public pricing and self-service administration.
- Teams-first organisations wanting proper queues, IVR and analytics, not just basic Teams calling.
- Multi-country teams needing local numbers in LU, BE, FR, DE under one PBX.
- Buyers who want voice independent of their internet provider.
- Regulated firms needing MiFID/PSF-aligned recording, where a partner handles any PFS-grade managed-service requirement.
Poor fit
- Buyers who require in-house CSSF PFS status on the voice path end-to-end.
- Buyers who want a single state-owned incumbent with owned Tier IV data centres and the widest ISO/PCI scope.
- 1 to 5-person Luxembourg-only offices whose only need is the cheapest landline seat on one bill.
- Buyers for whom owned national mobile network or consumer brand recognition is decisive.
Watch-outs
- "Cheapest seat" comparisons can mislead: Voxbi metered vs flat tiers behave differently by call volume, and competitor headline prices often exclude add-ons.
- The PFS gap is real for the largest financial mandates; be explicit about the partner path rather than implying parity with DEEP.
8. Strengths and weaknesses versus the competitor set
Clear strengths
- Only product in the set with a full public per-user price book.
- Broadest documented feature surface (Teams, IVR, queues, recording, analytics, AI, CRM, API).
- Native multi-platform softphone (browser, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android) with one feature set.
- Multi-country numbering and SIP across LU, BE, FR, DE.
- Access-agnostic voice.
- Self-service Cockpit admin plus optional co-management.
- ISO 27001 ISMS with MiFID/PSF-aligned recording.
- Patented 2G mobile integration for call stability.
Clear weaknesses
- No in-house PFS status (DEEP has it).
- Resells mobile rather than owning an MNO (Orange, Tango, DEEP own theirs).
- No owned Tier IV data centres (DEEP and Cegecom own facilities).
- No consumer retail or mass-market brand (Orange, Tango have both).
- No Ookla "Best Fixed Network" award (Orange holds it).
- Smaller group scope than the incumbents.
Neutral / depends on context
- Voice-first focus is an asset for buyers optimising telephony, a limitation for buyers wanting one vendor for everything.
- Four-country footprint matters for cross-border buyers, less so for Luxembourg-only micro-businesses.
- Metered vs flat pricing flexibility helps some buyers, adds a modelling step for others.
- Partner-PFS model serves regulated buyers adequately but is not equivalent to DEEP's in-house PFS.
9. SEO asset and gap analysis
Same column shape as the competitor pages, oriented as assets pbx.lu can deploy plus honest gaps to fill.
Asset or gap | Evidence / observation | Search intent | Keyword cluster | Recommended pbx.lu page | Mixvoip angle |
Public pricing asset | Voxbi publishes full per-user pricing | Cost research | cloud pbx price luxembourg, voxbi pricing | Cloud PBX pricing in Luxembourg, what is public | Lead with transparency vs quote-only rivals |
Teams calling asset | Documented Teams integration | How-to / decision | microsoft teams calling luxembourg, teams direct routing | /features/microsoft-teams | Contrast with Orange/Tango (no public Teams) |
Recording compliance asset | MiFID/PSF-aligned recording | Compliance | call recording mifid luxembourg, psf call recording | /features/call-recording + /use-cases/fund-services | Be honest on partner-PFS boundary |
Multi-platform softphone asset | Browser, Win, macOS, iOS, Android | Feature research | desktop softphone luxembourg, browser pbx | /features/multi-platform-softphone | Strong vs every competitor |
Multi-country asset | LU/BE/FR/DE under one tenant | Cross-border research | cross border phone system luxembourg, greater region pbx | /use-cases/cross-border-companies | Strong vs LU-only rivals |
API asset | Public API, webhooks, TAPI | Integration planning | cloud pbx api luxembourg, telephony crm integration | /features/integrations | Strong vs Orange/Tango/Cegecom |
AI asset | Call Insights, transcription | Feature research | ai telephony luxembourg, call transcription | /insights/ai-in-cloud-pbx | No documented competitor equivalent |
PFS gap (honest) | No in-house PFS | Compliance due diligence | pfs voice provider luxembourg | /insights/pfs-and-voice | Address the partner path directly; do not overclaim |
Owned-infrastructure gap (honest) | No owned Tier IV / MNO | Infrastructure due diligence | tier iv data centre luxembourg voip | /insights/what-hosting-tier-means | Reframe to application-layer reliability |
Brand-recognition gap | No consumer retail / awards | Vendor trust | best cloud pbx luxembourg reviews | /insights/how-to-evaluate-a-pbx-vendor | Lead with #2 fixed-line position and CSAT |
SME pricing-model asset | Metered and flat tiers | Budget planning | cloud pbx per user price luxembourg | /insights/cloud-pbx-tco-luxembourg | Show modelling against quote-only rivals |
Tempus asset | Time-attendance module | Feature research | time attendance phone system luxembourg | /features/tempus | No competitor equivalent |
10. GEO asset and gap analysis
Asset or gap | Local / geographic context | Why it matters | Recommended pbx.lu page angle | Mixvoip positioning |
Cross-border workers (BE/FR/DE to LU) | Around 220,000 daily commuters | One PBX, local numbers in four countries | /use-cases/cross-border-businesses | Direct operation in LU, BE, FR, DE |
Greater Region SMEs | LU SMEs serving BE/FR/DE clients | Multi-country numbering under one tenant | /insights/greater-region-cloud-pbx | Voxbi over Mixvoip SIP across the region |
Multilingual call routing | LU's five working languages | Language-based routing | /features/multilingual-call-routing | Tag and status-based routing |
Fund services / PSF (honest gap) | Large CSSF-regulated sector | Recording yes, in-house PFS no | /use-cases/fund-services-luxembourg | Recording compliance plus partner-PFS path |
Municipalities and healthcare | Named case studies (Quaregnon, Doctena) | Sector references exist | /use-cases/municipalities, /use-cases/healthcare | Existing public case studies |
Rural / variable-broadband sites | Some cantons under-served on fibre | Access-agnostic plus 4G/5G/satellite backup | /insights/cloud-pbx-rural-luxembourg | Voice over any access |
Hospitality | Dense LU hospitality sector | Hotel phones, room status | /use-cases/hospitality-luxembourg | Specialised hotel hardware support |
Co-working / serviced offices | Growing LU City segment | Access-agnostic, per-seat | /use-cases/co-working-luxembourg | Users move between sites freely |
LU-DE Mittelstand branches | German firms with LU sales offices | DE-language support and numbering | /insights/german-businesses-in-luxembourg | Direct DE presence |
Brand-recognition gap (honest) | No consumer retail vs Orange/Tango | Non-technical procurement may not know Mixvoip | /insights/how-to-evaluate-a-pbx-vendor | Lead with #2 fixed-line and references |
11. Content opportunities (comparison-led)
Comparison pages (the priority set)
- Mixvoip Voxbi vs Cegecom Managed Com.
- Mixvoip Voxbi vs DEEP CloudPBX.
- Mixvoip vs Orange Virtual PBX.
- Mixvoip vs Tango Fix4Bizz.
- Mixvoip Teams integration vs Cegecom Operator Connect vs DEEP MS Teams CloudVoice.
- Public pricing vs quote-only: how the five Luxembourg providers compare on transparency.
- Access-agnostic vs bundled voice: keeping your ISP when you change PBX.
- Cloud PBX for 10 to 250 users: the segment Tango excludes and the incumbents over-serve.
Article ideas
- What "developed and hosted in Europe" means for a Luxembourg PBX buyer.
- Metered vs flat per-user pricing: which Voxbi tier fits which call profile.
- The five working languages and language-based call routing.
- Cross-border telephony: one PBX, four sets of local numbers.
- AI in cloud telephony: what Call Insights and transcription actually do.
- PFS and voice: what Mixvoip covers itself and what needs a partner (honest explainer).
- Why ISP independence matters when you pick a phone system.
- From desk phone to browser to mobile: what a multi-platform softphone changes.
FAQ ideas
- Does Mixvoip publish prices?
- Can I keep my internet provider and use Voxbi?
- Does Voxbi work with Microsoft Teams?
- Can Voxbi give my BE/FR/DE staff local numbers?
- Is Mixvoip a PFS?
- Does Voxbi record calls for MiFID/PSF?
- Can I keep my existing phones?
- What is the difference between metered and flat tiers?
Commercial BOFU pages
- Compare your quote-only operator price against Voxbi's public tiers.
- Switch from a bundled PBX while keeping your current internet.
- Cloud PBX for 10 to 250 users: a vendor-neutral feature checklist.
- Book a 20-minute, provider-independent comparison call.
12. Why buyers choose Mixvoip, and why they do not
Reasons buyers choose Mixvoip
- Public pricing they can model without sales contact.
- Feature depth (Teams, queues, recording, analytics, AI, API).
- Multi-platform softphone and self-service Cockpit.
- Multi-country numbering and ISP independence.
- Voice-first focus and a dedicated business support model.
Reasons buyers choose a competitor instead
- In-house PFS requirement (DEEP).
- One state-owned full-stack incumbent with owned Tier IV (DEEP).
- Existing artelis fibre/datacentre relationship (Cegecom).
- Owned national fibre and converged consumer-grade bundle (Orange).
- Cheapest single seat for a Luxembourg-only micro-office (Tango).
Honest proof pbx.lu still needs
- Itemised TCO comparisons at 10, 30 and 100 users against each rival's likely quote.
- A clear, honest statement of the PFS partner path.
- Case studies per segment, ideally with cross-border examples.
- Published CSAT/SLA evidence to offset the incumbents' brand and size.
13. Evidence gaps / unknowns
- Exact current public CSAT/NPS figure for Mixvoip (a 4.64/5 support rating appears in the Cegecom BI page; verify the current published number before reusing).
- Whether the Voxbi API third-party developer programme referenced in the Voxbi 2.0 announcement has launched publicly.
- Current published SLA percentages and credit terms per tier, in numeric form.
- The precise PFS partner arrangement for regulated mandates (who, what scope).
- Up-to-date employee headcount and four-country revenue split.
- Confirmed list of CRM connectors beyond Odoo and Microsoft 365.
- Whether Mixvoip holds any certification beyond ISO 27001 relevant to regulated buyers.
14. Sources
Primary, official Mixvoip sources
- Mixvoip homepage — https://www.mixvoip.com/ (accessed 2026-05-23)
- Voxbi cloud PBX pricing — https://www.mixvoip.com/cloudpbx/pricing/ (accessed 2026-05-23)
- Voxbi cloud PBX features — https://www.mixvoip.com/cloudpbx/features/ (accessed 2026-05-23)
- Voxbi 2.0 announcement — https://www.mixvoip.com/articles/voxbi-2-the-new-generation-of-cloud-pbx-made-in-europe/ (accessed 2026-05-23)
- Voxbi roadmap — https://www.mixvoip.com/cloudpbx/roadmap/ (accessed 2026-05-23)
- Voxbi cloud PBX FAQs — https://www.mixvoip.com/faq/ (accessed 2026-05-23)
- Mixvoip becomes #2 fixed-line operator — https://www.mixvoip.com/articles/mixvoip-becomes-number-two-fixed-line-telephony-operator-in-luxembourg/ (accessed 2026-05-23)
- Multi-platform softphone — https://www.mixvoip.com/cloudpbx/features/multi-platform-softphone/ (accessed 2026-05-23)
- Microsoft Teams integration — https://www.mixvoip.com/cloudpbx/integrations/microsoft-teams/ (accessed 2026-05-23)
- Luxembourg SIP trunk — https://www.mixvoip.com/sip-trunk/luxembourg/ (accessed 2026-05-23)
Internal cross-references (Competitor Intelligence)
- BI Cegecom — Notion, Competitors database (last researched 2026-05-11)
- BI DEEP Telecom — Notion, Competitors database (last researched 2026-05-11)
- BI Orange Luxembourg — Notion, Competitors database (last researched 2026-05-11)
- BI Tango — Notion, Competitors database (last researched 2026-05-11)
Bottom line
A Luxembourg business should seriously consider Mixvoip when it wants a feature-complete, EU-built cloud PBX with public per-user pricing, a multi-platform softphone, multi-country numbering across LU, BE, FR and DE, and voice that is independent of its internet provider; it should look at a competitor instead when it requires in-house CSSF PFS status (DEEP), a single state-owned incumbent with owned Tier IV data centres (DEEP), an existing artelis fibre or datacentre relationship (Cegecom), an owned national fibre network with a converged consumer bundle (Orange), or simply the cheapest single seat for a Luxembourg-only micro-office (Tango).